parents who dont vaccinate your babies??

You know there are so mant threads about this same topic I just think if anyone is curious they can use that little search button up top and have fun reading the pages and pages that are already written. People are always starting these threads and it goes like this "why do parents who dont vaccinate blah blah blah" How many non vaccinating parents do you see starting threads about those who DO vaccinate? Are there countless threads geared toward those parents where non vaxing moms jump down your throats cuz we feel your injecting poison into your kids? Not many if any...Its like beating a dead horse already ](*,)
 
Well, it's a less than common decision to not vaccinate your children. So of course there are going to be more people who don't understand it. I think this thread was started with genuine questions, and if you don't want to answer them, then don't. But I think it's assumed that if you make the choice not to vaccinate, you've done a bit of research and thus would have information to offer.

And to be fair, the only accusatory comment made in this thread so far has been that people who vaccinate their babies can't have done any research or must regret their decision if they have.
 
Well, it's a less than common decision to not vaccinate your children. So of course there are going to be more people who don't understand it. I think this thread was started with genuine questions, and if you don't want to answer them, then don't. But I think it's assumed that if you make the choice not to vaccinate, you've done a bit of research and thus would have information to offer.

And to be fair, the only accusatory comment made in this thread so far has been that people who vaccinate their babies can't have done any research or must regret their decision if they have.

Your missing the point...there are MANY threads that have MANY answers to the SAME questions...do a search and have fun reading. Do you know the time that is put into researching vaccines? Then people want and expect others to sit there and go through the many points and information that they base their choice on..its kinda crazy already. You are a parent and its your job to dedicate the time to do the research and come to your own decision. I would never base my choice on what I read on a forum. And I disagree there have been comments made on this thread where we are selfish cuz we dont vaccinate...going around in circles I tell ya.
 
If u feel like that, ignore such threads? No one makes anyone repeat answers they have given previously?
 
I don't vaccinate currently and I don't owe it to anyone to explain why. If you are comfortable with your decision as a mother, then you won't justify yourself. That's just my two cents. My choice may not be mainstream and and can be seen as controversial, but it isn't wrong either and I find a lot of these threads have a "right vs. wrong" undertone to them, with non-vaxxing being the wrong, obviously.

Doctors aren't always right, either. I've seen an extremely horrific case here that proves that to me. And it wasn't just one doctor who was wrong; it was several. The baby in question is dead as a result and my son has his first name as his middle name to honour him. If doctors were failsafe, then Liam would have a different middle name, and my friend's little boy would be alive today.

It's silly to have the mentality that just because someone did x years at university, that they will always be right. Doctors have personal opinions as well. I've found doctors that do not encourage vaxxing. Does that make them wrong and any other who encourages it right? If so, that makes no sense, if all doctors are always right :shrug:
 
My kids get all their shots including the flu shot every year. My kids nor myself have ever gotten sick from the flu shot. Some people "say" it makes them sick or feel bad. Both of my older kids have asthma (not sure about lo yet) so esp with my DD the risk if her or any of them getting the flu would/could just about kill them with the respiratory problems they have. So I personally much rather them feel a little bad for a day or so from the shot then get the flu and it almost kill them! But like I said they have never felt bad or skipped a best after getting a flu shot. Me and DH haven't either.
 
We do selective vaccinations. My LO gets most of them, but not the ones that I feel aren't life-threatening. He hasn't gotten Hep B, or rotovirus, or flu, and I don't plan to give him the chickenpox one either. If he ever feels he needs them, I'm pretty sure he can still get them himself.
 
My baby is partially vaccinated. It does scare me and I can't help but wonder if it's the right decision and can't imagine living with myself if something happened to my child. Here's the catch though, if I fully vaccinate my baby, I KNOW I'm putting something harmful in her body that isn't fully researched. If I don't vaccinate, I'm left wondering if something bad is going to happen. It's a lose-lose situation the way I see it although with every passing month I figure the risk of something like whooping cough goes down. The vaccines I skipped are the ones that are high in aluminum as I know it is quite toxic. The thing is, no one ever studied how a baby metabolizes it when it's injected into muscular tissue. The body retains about 95% when injected intravenously and only 5% when ingested orally, but who the hell knows how they metabolize it the way it's actually injected? It's completely un-studied. There are already so many toxins in the environment I don't particularly fancy pumping my kid full of more. Unfortunately the most toxic vaccines also seem to be the most important. For example, the DTaP is important but is packed full of aluminum (my baby didn't get DTaP). Polio, however has hardly any but Americans in general are not at particular risk of contracting polio, yet my baby is vaccinated against it.

I know my decision and logic doesn't make sense to a lot of people, but I vaccinated when the vaccines were lower in toxins as I do understand the importance behind vaccines and avoided the more toxic ones as the toxins scare me.
 
I am choosing to keep my LO vaccine free for a number of reasons.

(1) Vaccines include a lot more than just the "virus" they are trying to prevent. Vaccines need to have a lot of other additives in them to be injectable into the body. Primarily, the biggest turn offs are mercury (thimerasol), aluminum, formaldehyde, biological ingredients such as aborted fetal cells, chick embryo cells, aborted calf cells, oil-based adjuvants, peanut oils, preservatives, and more (and worse).

Each vaccine contains most, if not all, of those ingredients (plus more I didn't list). Keep in mind that the average child will be injected with 36 vaccines before the age of 3. Each time you give your child a vaccine, you inject more mercury, more aluminum, more formaldehyde, more chemicals, more aborted cells, etc, into your LO's bloodstream.

The human body is not made to expel these ingredients easily. Mercury and aluminum can build up in the body, causing a lot of health issues and a lot of side effects. For example, the peanut oils in the vaccines cannot be easily broken down by the body. Thus, the body develops an intolerance to them and - ding ding - you get peanut allergies (ever wonder why the sudden increase in peanut allergies???)

Vaccine ingredients are absolutely terrifying. You can read more in depth about these ingredients here:
https://vran.org/about-vaccines/vaccine-ingredients/what-is-coming-through-that-needle/

(2) My second reason for not vaccinating my child is that the childhood illnesses they are attempting to prevent are NOT commonplace anymore. And it was not vaccinations that made these illnesses decrease to the extent they have - it was the improvement of living conditions - running water, waste management systems, better healthcare, increased hygiene, etc. If you had any idea the squalor people lived in back when these illnesses were rampant, the living conditions of today are 100x better. We don't go poop in a bucket in our house and then toss the bucket onto the muddy street, where it runs down a makeshift sewer and infects the local butcher's shop....Medical care for illnesses was very primitive - they didn't understand coughing on people spread illness, or what germs were.

(3) Even if my child contracted an illness, chances are it would run its course as "childhood illnesses" do, and if she ended up getting more sick than usual, medical technology of today can cure it up pretty darn well.

(4) I believe in evolution, I believe in nature, I believe that, for the human species to have survived as well as it has, our immune systems must be pretty tough. ESPECIALLY to make it through hundreds of thousands of years of dismal living conditions, and dismal medical treatments. Obviously our bodies can handle a sickness here or there.

I believe that breastfeeding and giving my child a natural antibodies to fight sickness is nature's intention. I believe that my child can be exposed to certain germs and her body will develop its own antibodies, and thus she will have a natural immunity rather than an artificial one.

(5) Vaccines don't necessarily protect your child from the intended illness. The whooping cough vaccine is notoriously known for being very ineffective. As a child, I was vaccinated for whooping cough and guess what - I still got it, in grade 3. I was MISERABLY sick for weeks, but with the proper treatment (humidifiers, puffers, etc), I was fine. And not just in the child's case, but ANY vaccine has the potential to be ineffective (ie: the flu vaccine "attempts" to predict which strain of flu could be the bad one for the year...most of the time, you inject yourself with the vaccine for the WRONG strain.) I would rather be sniffly and sneezy for 10 days than inject myself with such chemicals and nonsense.

In conclusion, there is NO way to know what the accumulation of all these vaccines will do to a person. 36 injections before the age of 3? Injecting things into your baby's body that were NEVER meant to be in a human's body is just a deplorable thought to me. I don't know how anyone could honestly justify vaccinating, especially after doing the research.

I find that many people shun those who choose not to vaccinate. But the difference, is that those of us who do not vaccinate have DONE OUR RESEARCH. We have not blindly accepted that "doctor knows best" when doctor is paid by pharmaceutical companies to sell, sell, sell. It is not about protecting health anymore, it is about making money. I find that, those who do vaccinate, have done so without an hour's worth of study. They do not investigate deeper, go around what one doctor suggests, and truly do the research and find out what these vaccines are doing to this world.

And when those parents who vaccinated because of fear DO do their research, they quickly become defensive about their decision to vaccinate because they feel cognitive dissonance between their decision and the evidence. That creates a hostile person, because they have done something that contradicts what the evidence truly says.

For all of these reasons, and then some, I choose not to vaccinate. I could never justify doing that to my child, especially after knowing what those vaccines contain, and the VERY high unlikelihood my child will contract anything in this day and age. And if she does catch something? No big deal. Maybe she'll be sick, but her body will fight it and she will be all the stronger for it.

Parents who do not vaccinate are often attacked by parents who do vaccinate. Why is it any of your concern? Why would you be worried? If your child is "VACCINATED" then you should have no problem with those who don't vaccinate. After all, your child won't 'get sick', right? So you are SO concerned for the health of my child? That you are willing to tell me I'm a bad parent for not vaccinating? I'm not sorry to say it, but I feel if you vaccinate without having done research, you fit the category of bad parent. In this day and age, it is essential to research. It is essential to go around the big pharmaceutical companies and the highly paid doctors and go behind the front lines, to discover for yourself what is going on. Watch documentaries, read the clinical experiments, open some books and do some research. This is your child's life, after all.

Thank you for this. I completely agree with you 100%. We are not intending to vaccinate.

My response is the following:

From the moment a baby is born the following is done: A synthetic Vitamin K injection is given to the child, and antibiotics are put in their eyes, all to 'protect the child'. Any pregnant woman who eats lots of greens throughout her pregnancy and doesn't have any STD's will be just fine without either of these, however these 'precautions' are 'recommended'. Why would my baby bleed to death? A baby's immune system is so fragile at birth, not to mention the liver/kidney function doesn't begin to function after approximately 2 weeks after birth. The extremely high doses of both the synthetic Vitamin K and antibiotics are basically poisoning the child since it has no way to filter either out of the body. On top of that, synthetic vitamins (as most drugstore vitamins) are not absorbed by the body, which again, harms your baby and shuts down its immune system before its even fully developed. This is from day one of its life! This brings me to my next points:

Doctors/pharmaceutical companies/the government have been concocting viruses in the lab for many years. This pays off for all of them. To promote their product and to make more money, they get the CDC to 'suggest' that you and your child 'need' this or that vaccine or shot. They get doctors to scare the poor parent into what the parent thinks is 'protecting their child' from future illnesses, when in fact these vaccinations are a) ineffective b) costly and c) cause more illnesses for you to come back and spend more money on healthcare throughout your lifetime. I prefer to question everything than to trust doctors, because everyone works for someone else and doctors are incessantly paid to promote certain products and the CDC is just another instrument of the government as well. I live in the US btw so this may not apply to all countries.

Back to the baby's immune system: that is correct that 36 vaccines will be introduced into your baby's body by the time they are 3yo. Improving their chances of not being sick, say the doctors? More like impairing your baby for life. The flu shot is heavy commercialized here, and you can get one on every corner. Yet every person I know had one, and got the flu. IMO these vaccines do not guard your baby against contracting one of these illnesses, rather they weaken the baby's immune systems and block up their little bodies with disgusting additives that produce these 'new hype illnesses'. A body out of order is bound to get sick and be more susceptible to sickness/illness, thus the baby will be more, instead of less, susceptible to getting sick. The whole purpose of these vaccines is backwards: instead of being a safeguard against harmful illnesses, they are a ticket to and a catalyst for health issues in the future.

IMO, the best way to keep your babies safe is to trust knowledge, not doctors. Doctors are just another commercial brand. Research natural health and the truth about vaccines, because this is not an ideal world and people will lie to you for money, and they will risk your and your baby's health for money. Breastfeed, get lots of fresh air, exercise, eat fresh foods, and keep your and your baby's bodies clean and free of toxins and chemicals. This IMO is the best way to keep your baby healthy for life. If your child gets sick, this is only an opportunity for them to build up their immune. Don't run out to the drugstore and buy a bunch of chemicals to 'make your baby better' because of your own worry. Allow their systems to naturally process the illness as this will only make them stronger! Don't underestimate or forget how strong and capable our bodies are, especially that of children! We often mean well, but the best of our intentions/fears/worries only do harm.

With that said, doctors/chemicals/drugs should only be used in the worst of cases and dire emergencies.

That's my take on the situation lovelies! :kiss:
 
I am choosing to keep my LO vaccine free for a number of reasons.

(1) Vaccines include a lot more than just the "virus" they are trying to prevent. Vaccines need to have a lot of other additives in them to be injectable into the body. Primarily, the biggest turn offs are mercury (thimerasol), aluminum, formaldehyde, biological ingredients such as aborted fetal cells, chick embryo cells, aborted calf cells, oil-based adjuvants, peanut oils, preservatives, and more (and worse).

Each vaccine contains most, if not all, of those ingredients (plus more I didn't list). Keep in mind that the average child will be injected with 36 vaccines before the age of 3. Each time you give your child a vaccine, you inject more mercury, more aluminum, more formaldehyde, more chemicals, more aborted cells, etc, into your LO's bloodstream.

The human body is not made to expel these ingredients easily. Mercury and aluminum can build up in the body, causing a lot of health issues and a lot of side effects. For example, the peanut oils in the vaccines cannot be easily broken down by the body. Thus, the body develops an intolerance to them and - ding ding - you get peanut allergies (ever wonder why the sudden increase in peanut allergies???)

Vaccine ingredients are absolutely terrifying. You can read more in depth about these ingredients here:
https://vran.org/about-vaccines/vaccine-ingredients/what-is-coming-through-that-needle/

(2) My second reason for not vaccinating my child is that the childhood illnesses they are attempting to prevent are NOT commonplace anymore. And it was not vaccinations that made these illnesses decrease to the extent they have - it was the improvement of living conditions - running water, waste management systems, better healthcare, increased hygiene, etc. If you had any idea the squalor people lived in back when these illnesses were rampant, the living conditions of today are 100x better. We don't go poop in a bucket in our house and then toss the bucket onto the muddy street, where it runs down a makeshift sewer and infects the local butcher's shop....Medical care for illnesses was very primitive - they didn't understand coughing on people spread illness, or what germs were.

(3) Even if my child contracted an illness, chances are it would run its course as "childhood illnesses" do, and if she ended up getting more sick than usual, medical technology of today can cure it up pretty darn well.

(4) I believe in evolution, I believe in nature, I believe that, for the human species to have survived as well as it has, our immune systems must be pretty tough. ESPECIALLY to make it through hundreds of thousands of years of dismal living conditions, and dismal medical treatments. Obviously our bodies can handle a sickness here or there.

I believe that breastfeeding and giving my child a natural antibodies to fight sickness is nature's intention. I believe that my child can be exposed to certain germs and her body will develop its own antibodies, and thus she will have a natural immunity rather than an artificial one.

(5) Vaccines don't necessarily protect your child from the intended illness. The whooping cough vaccine is notoriously known for being very ineffective. As a child, I was vaccinated for whooping cough and guess what - I still got it, in grade 3. I was MISERABLY sick for weeks, but with the proper treatment (humidifiers, puffers, etc), I was fine. And not just in the child's case, but ANY vaccine has the potential to be ineffective (ie: the flu vaccine "attempts" to predict which strain of flu could be the bad one for the year...most of the time, you inject yourself with the vaccine for the WRONG strain.) I would rather be sniffly and sneezy for 10 days than inject myself with such chemicals and nonsense.

In conclusion, there is NO way to know what the accumulation of all these vaccines will do to a person. 36 injections before the age of 3? Injecting things into your baby's body that were NEVER meant to be in a human's body is just a deplorable thought to me. I don't know how anyone could honestly justify vaccinating, especially after doing the research.

I find that many people shun those who choose not to vaccinate. But the difference, is that those of us who do not vaccinate have DONE OUR RESEARCH. We have not blindly accepted that "doctor knows best" when doctor is paid by pharmaceutical companies to sell, sell, sell. It is not about protecting health anymore, it is about making money. I find that, those who do vaccinate, have done so without an hour's worth of study. They do not investigate deeper, go around what one doctor suggests, and truly do the research and find out what these vaccines are doing to this world.

And when those parents who vaccinated because of fear DO do their research, they quickly become defensive about their decision to vaccinate because they feel cognitive dissonance between their decision and the evidence. That creates a hostile person, because they have done something that contradicts what the evidence truly says.

For all of these reasons, and then some, I choose not to vaccinate. I could never justify doing that to my child, especially after knowing what those vaccines contain, and the VERY high unlikelihood my child will contract anything in this day and age. And if she does catch something? No big deal. Maybe she'll be sick, but her body will fight it and she will be all the stronger for it.

Parents who do not vaccinate are often attacked by parents who do vaccinate. Why is it any of your concern? Why would you be worried? If your child is "VACCINATED" then you should have no problem with those who don't vaccinate. After all, your child won't 'get sick', right? So you are SO concerned for the health of my child? That you are willing to tell me I'm a bad parent for not vaccinating? I'm not sorry to say it, but I feel if you vaccinate without having done research, you fit the category of bad parent. In this day and age, it is essential to research. It is essential to go around the big pharmaceutical companies and the highly paid doctors and go behind the front lines, to discover for yourself what is going on. Watch documentaries, read the clinical experiments, open some books and do some research. This is your child's life, after all.

Thank you for this. I completely agree with you 100%. We are not intending to vaccinate.

My response is the following:

From the moment a baby is born the following is done: A synthetic Vitamin K injection is given to the child, and antibiotics are put in their eyes, all to 'protect the child'. Any pregnant woman who eats lots of greens throughout her pregnancy and doesn't have any STD's will be just fine without either of these, however these 'precautions' are 'recommended'. Why would my baby bleed to death? A baby's immune system is so fragile at birth, not to mention the liver/kidney function doesn't begin to function after approximately 2 weeks after birth. The extremely high doses of both the synthetic Vitamin K and antibiotics are basically poisoning the child since it has no way to filter either out of the body. On top of that, synthetic vitamins (as most drugstore vitamins) are not absorbed by the body, which again, harms your baby and shuts down its immune system before its even fully developed. This is from day one of its life! This brings me to my next points:

Doctors/pharmaceutical companies/the government have been concocting viruses in the lab for many years. This pays off for all of them. To promote their product and to make more money, they get the CDC to 'suggest' that you and your child 'need' this or that vaccine or shot. They get doctors to scare the poor parent into what the parent thinks is 'protecting their child' from future illnesses, when in fact these vaccinations are a) ineffective b) costly and c) cause more illnesses for you to come back and spend more money on healthcare throughout your lifetime. I prefer to question everything than to trust doctors, because everyone works for someone else and doctors are incessantly paid to promote certain products and the CDC is just another instrument of the government as well. I live in the US btw so this may not apply to all countries.

Back to the baby's immune system: that is correct that 36 vaccines will be introduced into your baby's body by the time they are 3yo. Improving their chances of not being sick, say the doctors? More like impairing your baby for life. The flu shot is heavy commercialized here, and you can get one on every corner. Yet every person I know had one, and got the flu. IMO these vaccines do not guard your baby against contracting one of these illnesses, rather they weaken the baby's immune systems and block up their little bodies with disgusting additives that produce these 'new hype illnesses'. A body out of order is bound to get sick and be more susceptible to sickness/illness, thus the baby will be more, instead of less, susceptible to getting sick. The whole purpose of these vaccines is backwards: instead of being a safeguard against harmful illnesses, they are a ticket to and a catalyst for health issues in the future.

IMO, the best way to keep your babies safe is to trust knowledge, not doctors. Doctors are just another commercial brand.Research natural health and the truth about vaccines, because this is not an ideal world and people will lie to you for money, and they will risk your and your baby's health for money. Breastfeed, get lots of fresh air, exercise, eat fresh foods, and keep your and your baby's bodies clean and free of toxins and chemicals. This IMO is the best way to keep your baby healthy for life. If your child gets sick, this is only an opportunity for them to build up their immune. Don't run out to the drugstore and buy a bunch of chemicals to 'make your baby better' because of your own worry. Allow their systems to naturally process the illness as this will only make them stronger! Don't underestimate or forget how strong and capable our bodies are, especially that of children! We often mean well, but the best of our intentions/fears/worries only do harm.

With that said, doctors/chemicals/drugs should only be used in the worst of cases and dire emergencies.

That's my take on the situation lovelies! :kiss:


I just emailed your post with the highlighted bits to my Mum, she's working nights as consultant cardiologist at a hospital here in Bristol...

This was her response:

LOL (is that how you say it darling?) I might as well go home and get some sleep then!
 
My kids get all their shots including the flu shot every year. My kids nor myself have ever gotten sick from the flu shot. Some people "say" it makes them sick or feel bad. Both of my older kids have asthma (not sure about lo yet) so esp with my DD the risk if her or any of them getting the flu would/could just about kill them with the respiratory problems they have. So I personally much rather them feel a little bad for a day or so from the shot then get the flu and it almost kill them! But like I said they have never felt bad or skipped a best after getting a flu shot. Me and DH haven't either.

Asthma amongst other immune diseases and respiratory problems have been linked to vaccines. From what I have read, various studies. I cannot say for sure this is why your children have asthma. Just food for thought.
If it were true and neither I or you know why they have asthma BUT if vaccines were the cause then this whole thing would be ironic.
 
I will not say anything against anti vaxers, I'm only saying something I have extensive knowledge with (biological evolution) because it was brought up as a point. The human race hasn't survived near as well as believed (bubonic plague... A third of Europe dead.. Not saying anything now is like this, just saying we aren't as resilient as you'd think). As we have evolved all this time, so have viruses... And their fast reproduction enables them to get past a lot of our vaccinations because they adapt and evolve so well to survive. That's why the flu shot changes every year, the virus evolves.
You just can't take a bet on evolution cause historically it's let us down. Again, don't get me wrong, it doesn't matter to me what choice you make, I'm just a person on the Internet after all.
 
I am choosing to keep my LO vaccine free for a number of reasons.

(1) Vaccines include a lot more than just the "virus" they are trying to prevent. Vaccines need to have a lot of other additives in them to be injectable into the body. Primarily, the biggest turn offs are mercury (thimerasol), aluminum, formaldehyde, biological ingredients such as aborted fetal cells, chick embryo cells, aborted calf cells, oil-based adjuvants, peanut oils, preservatives, and more (and worse).

Each vaccine contains most, if not all, of those ingredients (plus more I didn't list). Keep in mind that the average child will be injected with 36 vaccines before the age of 3. Each time you give your child a vaccine, you inject more mercury, more aluminum, more formaldehyde, more chemicals, more aborted cells, etc, into your LO's bloodstream.

The human body is not made to expel these ingredients easily. Mercury and aluminum can build up in the body, causing a lot of health issues and a lot of side effects. For example, the peanut oils in the vaccines cannot be easily broken down by the body. Thus, the body develops an intolerance to them and - ding ding - you get peanut allergies (ever wonder why the sudden increase in peanut allergies???)

Vaccine ingredients are absolutely terrifying. You can read more in depth about these ingredients here:
https://vran.org/about-vaccines/vaccine-ingredients/what-is-coming-through-that-needle/

(2) My second reason for not vaccinating my child is that the childhood illnesses they are attempting to prevent are NOT commonplace anymore. And it was not vaccinations that made these illnesses decrease to the extent they have - it was the improvement of living conditions - running water, waste management systems, better healthcare, increased hygiene, etc. If you had any idea the squalor people lived in back when these illnesses were rampant, the living conditions of today are 100x better. We don't go poop in a bucket in our house and then toss the bucket onto the muddy street, where it runs down a makeshift sewer and infects the local butcher's shop....Medical care for illnesses was very primitive - they didn't understand coughing on people spread illness, or what germs were.

(3) Even if my child contracted an illness, chances are it would run its course as "childhood illnesses" do, and if she ended up getting more sick than usual, medical technology of today can cure it up pretty darn well.

(4) I believe in evolution, I believe in nature, I believe that, for the human species to have survived as well as it has, our immune systems must be pretty tough. ESPECIALLY to make it through hundreds of thousands of years of dismal living conditions, and dismal medical treatments. Obviously our bodies can handle a sickness here or there.

I believe that breastfeeding and giving my child a natural antibodies to fight sickness is nature's intention. I believe that my child can be exposed to certain germs and her body will develop its own antibodies, and thus she will have a natural immunity rather than an artificial one.

(5) Vaccines don't necessarily protect your child from the intended illness. The whooping cough vaccine is notoriously known for being very ineffective. As a child, I was vaccinated for whooping cough and guess what - I still got it, in grade 3. I was MISERABLY sick for weeks, but with the proper treatment (humidifiers, puffers, etc), I was fine. And not just in the child's case, but ANY vaccine has the potential to be ineffective (ie: the flu vaccine "attempts" to predict which strain of flu could be the bad one for the year...most of the time, you inject yourself with the vaccine for the WRONG strain.) I would rather be sniffly and sneezy for 10 days than inject myself with such chemicals and nonsense.

In conclusion, there is NO way to know what the accumulation of all these vaccines will do to a person. 36 injections before the age of 3? Injecting things into your baby's body that were NEVER meant to be in a human's body is just a deplorable thought to me. I don't know how anyone could honestly justify vaccinating, especially after doing the research.

I find that many people shun those who choose not to vaccinate. But the difference, is that those of us who do not vaccinate have DONE OUR RESEARCH. We have not blindly accepted that "doctor knows best" when doctor is paid by pharmaceutical companies to sell, sell, sell. It is not about protecting health anymore, it is about making money. I find that, those who do vaccinate, have done so without an hour's worth of study. They do not investigate deeper, go around what one doctor suggests, and truly do the research and find out what these vaccines are doing to this world.

And when those parents who vaccinated because of fear DO do their research, they quickly become defensive about their decision to vaccinate because they feel cognitive dissonance between their decision and the evidence. That creates a hostile person, because they have done something that contradicts what the evidence truly says.

For all of these reasons, and then some, I choose not to vaccinate. I could never justify doing that to my child, especially after knowing what those vaccines contain, and the VERY high unlikelihood my child will contract anything in this day and age. And if she does catch something? No big deal. Maybe she'll be sick, but her body will fight it and she will be all the stronger for it.

Parents who do not vaccinate are often attacked by parents who do vaccinate. Why is it any of your concern? Why would you be worried? If your child is "VACCINATED" then you should have no problem with those who don't vaccinate. After all, your child won't 'get sick', right? So you are SO concerned for the health of my child? That you are willing to tell me I'm a bad parent for not vaccinating? I'm not sorry to say it, but I feel if you vaccinate without having done research, you fit the category of bad parent. In this day and age, it is essential to research. It is essential to go around the big pharmaceutical companies and the highly paid doctors and go behind the front lines, to discover for yourself what is going on. Watch documentaries, read the clinical experiments, open some books and do some research. This is your child's life, after all.

Thank you for this. I completely agree with you 100%. We are not intending to vaccinate.

My response is the following:

From the moment a baby is born the following is done: A synthetic Vitamin K injection is given to the child, and antibiotics are put in their eyes, all to 'protect the child'. Any pregnant woman who eats lots of greens throughout her pregnancy and doesn't have any STD's will be just fine without either of these, however these 'precautions' are 'recommended'. Why would my baby bleed to death? A baby's immune system is so fragile at birth, not to mention the liver/kidney function doesn't begin to function after approximately 2 weeks after birth. The extremely high doses of both the synthetic Vitamin K and antibiotics are basically poisoning the child since it has no way to filter either out of the body. On top of that, synthetic vitamins (as most drugstore vitamins) are not absorbed by the body, which again, harms your baby and shuts down its immune system before its even fully developed. This is from day one of its life! This brings me to my next points:

Doctors/pharmaceutical companies/the government have been concocting viruses in the lab for many years. This pays off for all of them. To promote their product and to make more money, they get the CDC to 'suggest' that you and your child 'need' this or that vaccine or shot. They get doctors to scare the poor parent into what the parent thinks is 'protecting their child' from future illnesses, when in fact these vaccinations are a) ineffective b) costly and c) cause more illnesses for you to come back and spend more money on healthcare throughout your lifetime. I prefer to question everything than to trust doctors, because everyone works for someone else and doctors are incessantly paid to promote certain products and the CDC is just another instrument of the government as well. I live in the US btw so this may not apply to all countries.

Back to the baby's immune system: that is correct that 36 vaccines will be introduced into your baby's body by the time they are 3yo. Improving their chances of not being sick, say the doctors? More like impairing your baby for life. The flu shot is heavy commercialized here, and you can get one on every corner. Yet every person I know had one, and got the flu. IMO these vaccines do not guard your baby against contracting one of these illnesses, rather they weaken the baby's immune systems and block up their little bodies with disgusting additives that produce these 'new hype illnesses'. A body out of order is bound to get sick and be more susceptible to sickness/illness, thus the baby will be more, instead of less, susceptible to getting sick. The whole purpose of these vaccines is backwards: instead of being a safeguard against harmful illnesses, they are a ticket to and a catalyst for health issues in the future.

IMO, the best way to keep your babies safe is to trust knowledge, not doctors. Doctors are just another commercial brand.Research natural health and the truth about vaccines, because this is not an ideal world and people will lie to you for money, and they will risk your and your baby's health for money. Breastfeed, get lots of fresh air, exercise, eat fresh foods, and keep your and your baby's bodies clean and free of toxins and chemicals. This IMO is the best way to keep your baby healthy for life. If your child gets sick, this is only an opportunity for them to build up their immune. Don't run out to the drugstore and buy a bunch of chemicals to 'make your baby better' because of your own worry. Allow their systems to naturally process the illness as this will only make them stronger! Don't underestimate or forget how strong and capable our bodies are, especially that of children! We often mean well, but the best of our intentions/fears/worries only do harm.

With that said, doctors/chemicals/drugs should only be used in the worst of cases and dire emergencies.

That's my take on the situation lovelies! :kiss:


I just emailed your post with the highlighted bits to my Mum, she's working nights as consultant cardiologist at a hospital here in Bristol...

This was her response:

LOL (is that how you say it darling?) I might as well go home and get some sleep then!

Sorry, not sure I understand the meaning behind your response. I'm not sure how it is where you are, but Americans run to the doctor if their child gets the darn hiccups or drools. Then they make sure to quickly stuff down some drugs. Drug use on adults and children is greatly overused here. I stand firmly by my opinion. :shrug:
 
I am choosing to keep my LO vaccine free for a number of reasons.

(1) Vaccines include a lot more than just the "virus" they are trying to prevent. Vaccines need to have a lot of other additives in them to be injectable into the body. Primarily, the biggest turn offs are mercury (thimerasol), aluminum, formaldehyde, biological ingredients such as aborted fetal cells, chick embryo cells, aborted calf cells, oil-based adjuvants, peanut oils, preservatives, and more (and worse).

Each vaccine contains most, if not all, of those ingredients (plus more I didn't list). Keep in mind that the average child will be injected with 36 vaccines before the age of 3. Each time you give your child a vaccine, you inject more mercury, more aluminum, more formaldehyde, more chemicals, more aborted cells, etc, into your LO's bloodstream.

The human body is not made to expel these ingredients easily. Mercury and aluminum can build up in the body, causing a lot of health issues and a lot of side effects. For example, the peanut oils in the vaccines cannot be easily broken down by the body. Thus, the body develops an intolerance to them and - ding ding - you get peanut allergies (ever wonder why the sudden increase in peanut allergies???)

Vaccine ingredients are absolutely terrifying. You can read more in depth about these ingredients here:
https://vran.org/about-vaccines/vaccine-ingredients/what-is-coming-through-that-needle/

(2) My second reason for not vaccinating my child is that the childhood illnesses they are attempting to prevent are NOT commonplace anymore. And it was not vaccinations that made these illnesses decrease to the extent they have - it was the improvement of living conditions - running water, waste management systems, better healthcare, increased hygiene, etc. If you had any idea the squalor people lived in back when these illnesses were rampant, the living conditions of today are 100x better. We don't go poop in a bucket in our house and then toss the bucket onto the muddy street, where it runs down a makeshift sewer and infects the local butcher's shop....Medical care for illnesses was very primitive - they didn't understand coughing on people spread illness, or what germs were.

(3) Even if my child contracted an illness, chances are it would run its course as "childhood illnesses" do, and if she ended up getting more sick than usual, medical technology of today can cure it up pretty darn well.

(4) I believe in evolution, I believe in nature, I believe that, for the human species to have survived as well as it has, our immune systems must be pretty tough. ESPECIALLY to make it through hundreds of thousands of years of dismal living conditions, and dismal medical treatments. Obviously our bodies can handle a sickness here or there.

I believe that breastfeeding and giving my child a natural antibodies to fight sickness is nature's intention. I believe that my child can be exposed to certain germs and her body will develop its own antibodies, and thus she will have a natural immunity rather than an artificial one.

(5) Vaccines don't necessarily protect your child from the intended illness. The whooping cough vaccine is notoriously known for being very ineffective. As a child, I was vaccinated for whooping cough and guess what - I still got it, in grade 3. I was MISERABLY sick for weeks, but with the proper treatment (humidifiers, puffers, etc), I was fine. And not just in the child's case, but ANY vaccine has the potential to be ineffective (ie: the flu vaccine "attempts" to predict which strain of flu could be the bad one for the year...most of the time, you inject yourself with the vaccine for the WRONG strain.) I would rather be sniffly and sneezy for 10 days than inject myself with such chemicals and nonsense.

In conclusion, there is NO way to know what the accumulation of all these vaccines will do to a person. 36 injections before the age of 3? Injecting things into your baby's body that were NEVER meant to be in a human's body is just a deplorable thought to me. I don't know how anyone could honestly justify vaccinating, especially after doing the research.

I find that many people shun those who choose not to vaccinate. But the difference, is that those of us who do not vaccinate have DONE OUR RESEARCH. We have not blindly accepted that "doctor knows best" when doctor is paid by pharmaceutical companies to sell, sell, sell. It is not about protecting health anymore, it is about making money. I find that, those who do vaccinate, have done so without an hour's worth of study. They do not investigate deeper, go around what one doctor suggests, and truly do the research and find out what these vaccines are doing to this world.

And when those parents who vaccinated because of fear DO do their research, they quickly become defensive about their decision to vaccinate because they feel cognitive dissonance between their decision and the evidence. That creates a hostile person, because they have done something that contradicts what the evidence truly says.

For all of these reasons, and then some, I choose not to vaccinate. I could never justify doing that to my child, especially after knowing what those vaccines contain, and the VERY high unlikelihood my child will contract anything in this day and age. And if she does catch something? No big deal. Maybe she'll be sick, but her body will fight it and she will be all the stronger for it.

Parents who do not vaccinate are often attacked by parents who do vaccinate. Why is it any of your concern? Why would you be worried? If your child is "VACCINATED" then you should have no problem with those who don't vaccinate. After all, your child won't 'get sick', right? So you are SO concerned for the health of my child? That you are willing to tell me I'm a bad parent for not vaccinating? I'm not sorry to say it, but I feel if you vaccinate without having done research, you fit the category of bad parent. In this day and age, it is essential to research. It is essential to go around the big pharmaceutical companies and the highly paid doctors and go behind the front lines, to discover for yourself what is going on. Watch documentaries, read the clinical experiments, open some books and do some research. This is your child's life, after all.

Thank you for this. I completely agree with you 100%. We are not intending to vaccinate.

My response is the following:

From the moment a baby is born the following is done: A synthetic Vitamin K injection is given to the child, and antibiotics are put in their eyes, all to 'protect the child'. Any pregnant woman who eats lots of greens throughout her pregnancy and doesn't have any STD's will be just fine without either of these, however these 'precautions' are 'recommended'. Why would my baby bleed to death?

I just gotta stop you and point you to this...
https://www.skepticalob.com/2013/01/baby-dies-because-mother-refused-newborn-vitamin-k-shot.html

Don't bother with the rest of the website... just scroll down to the link to the Coroner's Court.
Read the coroner's report and then please come back and tell me that the Vit K shot is unncessary.
It's a VITAMIN. Why on earth would anyone be against giving their baby a shot of a vitamin that will help prevent them from having blood clotting issues?
 
Sorry, not sure I understand the meaning behind your response. I'm not sure how it is where you are, but Americans run to the doctor if their child gets the darn hiccups or drools. Then they make sure to quickly stuff down some drugs. Drug use on adults and children is greatly overused here. I stand firmly by my opinion. :shrug:

I was going to stay out of this but I hate when people talk about Americans this way, even if they themselves are fellow Americans. Maybe some people are like this but not all. My son hasn't been back for anything other than routine check ups since he was born. I will call if something seems to be not quite right. I've called twice - once after he threw up (never seen anything like it in my whole life - he and his car seat were covered in it and the amount and rate at which it came out was alarming) and when he had a cold because he was having a hard time breathing and I didn't know what I could give him (turns out nothing). But I don't take him for every little problem. He'd live at the hospital if that were the case (especially when it comes to drooling!).

ETA I agree that drugs are overused in this country but I think that's more the fault of doctors than patients. You can't get a prescription with a doctors permission. They're the ones over prescribing.
 
I am choosing to keep my LO vaccine free for a number of reasons.

(1) Vaccines include a lot more than just the "virus" they are trying to prevent. Vaccines need to have a lot of other additives in them to be injectable into the body. Primarily, the biggest turn offs are mercury (thimerasol), aluminum, formaldehyde, biological ingredients such as aborted fetal cells, chick embryo cells, aborted calf cells, oil-based adjuvants, peanut oils, preservatives, and more (and worse).

Each vaccine contains most, if not all, of those ingredients (plus more I didn't list). Keep in mind that the average child will be injected with 36 vaccines before the age of 3. Each time you give your child a vaccine, you inject more mercury, more aluminum, more formaldehyde, more chemicals, more aborted cells, etc, into your LO's bloodstream.

The human body is not made to expel these ingredients easily. Mercury and aluminum can build up in the body, causing a lot of health issues and a lot of side effects. For example, the peanut oils in the vaccines cannot be easily broken down by the body. Thus, the body develops an intolerance to them and - ding ding - you get peanut allergies (ever wonder why the sudden increase in peanut allergies???)

Vaccine ingredients are absolutely terrifying. You can read more in depth about these ingredients here:
https://vran.org/about-vaccines/vaccine-ingredients/what-is-coming-through-that-needle/

(2) My second reason for not vaccinating my child is that the childhood illnesses they are attempting to prevent are NOT commonplace anymore. And it was not vaccinations that made these illnesses decrease to the extent they have - it was the improvement of living conditions - running water, waste management systems, better healthcare, increased hygiene, etc. If you had any idea the squalor people lived in back when these illnesses were rampant, the living conditions of today are 100x better. We don't go poop in a bucket in our house and then toss the bucket onto the muddy street, where it runs down a makeshift sewer and infects the local butcher's shop....Medical care for illnesses was very primitive - they didn't understand coughing on people spread illness, or what germs were.

(3) Even if my child contracted an illness, chances are it would run its course as "childhood illnesses" do, and if she ended up getting more sick than usual, medical technology of today can cure it up pretty darn well.

(4) I believe in evolution, I believe in nature, I believe that, for the human species to have survived as well as it has, our immune systems must be pretty tough. ESPECIALLY to make it through hundreds of thousands of years of dismal living conditions, and dismal medical treatments. Obviously our bodies can handle a sickness here or there.

I believe that breastfeeding and giving my child a natural antibodies to fight sickness is nature's intention. I believe that my child can be exposed to certain germs and her body will develop its own antibodies, and thus she will have a natural immunity rather than an artificial one.

(5) Vaccines don't necessarily protect your child from the intended illness. The whooping cough vaccine is notoriously known for being very ineffective. As a child, I was vaccinated for whooping cough and guess what - I still got it, in grade 3. I was MISERABLY sick for weeks, but with the proper treatment (humidifiers, puffers, etc), I was fine. And not just in the child's case, but ANY vaccine has the potential to be ineffective (ie: the flu vaccine "attempts" to predict which strain of flu could be the bad one for the year...most of the time, you inject yourself with the vaccine for the WRONG strain.) I would rather be sniffly and sneezy for 10 days than inject myself with such chemicals and nonsense.

In conclusion, there is NO way to know what the accumulation of all these vaccines will do to a person. 36 injections before the age of 3? Injecting things into your baby's body that were NEVER meant to be in a human's body is just a deplorable thought to me. I don't know how anyone could honestly justify vaccinating, especially after doing the research.

I find that many people shun those who choose not to vaccinate. But the difference, is that those of us who do not vaccinate have DONE OUR RESEARCH. We have not blindly accepted that "doctor knows best" when doctor is paid by pharmaceutical companies to sell, sell, sell. It is not about protecting health anymore, it is about making money. I find that, those who do vaccinate, have done so without an hour's worth of study. They do not investigate deeper, go around what one doctor suggests, and truly do the research and find out what these vaccines are doing to this world.

And when those parents who vaccinated because of fear DO do their research, they quickly become defensive about their decision to vaccinate because they feel cognitive dissonance between their decision and the evidence. That creates a hostile person, because they have done something that contradicts what the evidence truly says.

For all of these reasons, and then some, I choose not to vaccinate. I could never justify doing that to my child, especially after knowing what those vaccines contain, and the VERY high unlikelihood my child will contract anything in this day and age. And if she does catch something? No big deal. Maybe she'll be sick, but her body will fight it and she will be all the stronger for it.

Parents who do not vaccinate are often attacked by parents who do vaccinate. Why is it any of your concern? Why would you be worried? If your child is "VACCINATED" then you should have no problem with those who don't vaccinate. After all, your child won't 'get sick', right? So you are SO concerned for the health of my child? That you are willing to tell me I'm a bad parent for not vaccinating? I'm not sorry to say it, but I feel if you vaccinate without having done research, you fit the category of bad parent. In this day and age, it is essential to research. It is essential to go around the big pharmaceutical companies and the highly paid doctors and go behind the front lines, to discover for yourself what is going on. Watch documentaries, read the clinical experiments, open some books and do some research. This is your child's life, after all.

Thank you for this. I completely agree with you 100%. We are not intending to vaccinate.

My response is the following:

From the moment a baby is born the following is done: A synthetic Vitamin K injection is given to the child, and antibiotics are put in their eyes, all to 'protect the child'. Any pregnant woman who eats lots of greens throughout her pregnancy and doesn't have any STD's will be just fine without either of these, however these 'precautions' are 'recommended'. Why would my baby bleed to death? A baby's immune system is so fragile at birth, not to mention the liver/kidney function doesn't begin to function after approximately 2 weeks after birth. The extremely high doses of both the synthetic Vitamin K and antibiotics are basically poisoning the child since it has no way to filter either out of the body. On top of that, synthetic vitamins (as most drugstore vitamins) are not absorbed by the body, which again, harms your baby and shuts down its immune system before its even fully developed. This is from day one of its life! This brings me to my next points:

Doctors/pharmaceutical companies/the government have been concocting viruses in the lab for many years. This pays off for all of them. To promote their product and to make more money, they get the CDC to 'suggest' that you and your child 'need' this or that vaccine or shot. They get doctors to scare the poor parent into what the parent thinks is 'protecting their child' from future illnesses, when in fact these vaccinations are a) ineffective b) costly and c) cause more illnesses for you to come back and spend more money on healthcare throughout your lifetime. I prefer to question everything than to trust doctors, because everyone works for someone else and doctors are incessantly paid to promote certain products and the CDC is just another instrument of the government as well. I live in the US btw so this may not apply to all countries.

Back to the baby's immune system: that is correct that 36 vaccines will be introduced into your baby's body by the time they are 3yo. Improving their chances of not being sick, say the doctors? More like impairing your baby for life. The flu shot is heavy commercialized here, and you can get one on every corner. Yet every person I know had one, and got the flu. IMO these vaccines do not guard your baby against contracting one of these illnesses, rather they weaken the baby's immune systems and block up their little bodies with disgusting additives that produce these 'new hype illnesses'. A body out of order is bound to get sick and be more susceptible to sickness/illness, thus the baby will be more, instead of less, susceptible to getting sick. The whole purpose of these vaccines is backwards: instead of being a safeguard against harmful illnesses, they are a ticket to and a catalyst for health issues in the future.

IMO, the best way to keep your babies safe is to trust knowledge, not doctors. Doctors are just another commercial brand.Research natural health and the truth about vaccines, because this is not an ideal world and people will lie to you for money, and they will risk your and your baby's health for money. Breastfeed, get lots of fresh air, exercise, eat fresh foods, and keep your and your baby's bodies clean and free of toxins and chemicals. This IMO is the best way to keep your baby healthy for life. If your child gets sick, this is only an opportunity for them to build up their immune. Don't run out to the drugstore and buy a bunch of chemicals to 'make your baby better' because of your own worry. Allow their systems to naturally process the illness as this will only make them stronger! Don't underestimate or forget how strong and capable our bodies are, especially that of children! We often mean well, but the best of our intentions/fears/worries only do harm.

With that said, doctors/chemicals/drugs should only be used in the worst of cases and dire emergencies.

That's my take on the situation lovelies! :kiss:


I just emailed your post with the highlighted bits to my Mum, she's working nights as consultant cardiologist at a hospital here in Bristol...

This was her response:

LOL (is that how you say it darling?) I might as well go home and get some sleep then!

Sorry, not sure I understand the meaning behind your response. I'm not sure how it is where you are, but Americans run to the doctor if their child gets the darn hiccups or drools. Then they make sure to quickly stuff down some drugs. Drug use on adults and children is greatly overused here. I stand firmly by my opinion. :shrug:

I think you are just out to offend now....glad you have that perception of americans...really uncalled for.
 
I am choosing to keep my LO vaccine free for a number of reasons.

(1) Vaccines include a lot more than just the "virus" they are trying to prevent. Vaccines need to have a lot of other additives in them to be injectable into the body. Primarily, the biggest turn offs are mercury (thimerasol), aluminum, formaldehyde, biological ingredients such as aborted fetal cells, chick embryo cells, aborted calf cells, oil-based adjuvants, peanut oils, preservatives, and more (and worse).

Each vaccine contains most, if not all, of those ingredients (plus more I didn't list). Keep in mind that the average child will be injected with 36 vaccines before the age of 3. Each time you give your child a vaccine, you inject more mercury, more aluminum, more formaldehyde, more chemicals, more aborted cells, etc, into your LO's bloodstream.

The human body is not made to expel these ingredients easily. Mercury and aluminum can build up in the body, causing a lot of health issues and a lot of side effects. For example, the peanut oils in the vaccines cannot be easily broken down by the body. Thus, the body develops an intolerance to them and - ding ding - you get peanut allergies (ever wonder why the sudden increase in peanut allergies???)

Vaccine ingredients are absolutely terrifying. You can read more in depth about these ingredients here:
https://vran.org/about-vaccines/vaccine-ingredients/what-is-coming-through-that-needle/

(2) My second reason for not vaccinating my child is that the childhood illnesses they are attempting to prevent are NOT commonplace anymore. And it was not vaccinations that made these illnesses decrease to the extent they have - it was the improvement of living conditions - running water, waste management systems, better healthcare, increased hygiene, etc. If you had any idea the squalor people lived in back when these illnesses were rampant, the living conditions of today are 100x better. We don't go poop in a bucket in our house and then toss the bucket onto the muddy street, where it runs down a makeshift sewer and infects the local butcher's shop....Medical care for illnesses was very primitive - they didn't understand coughing on people spread illness, or what germs were.

(3) Even if my child contracted an illness, chances are it would run its course as "childhood illnesses" do, and if she ended up getting more sick than usual, medical technology of today can cure it up pretty darn well.

(4) I believe in evolution, I believe in nature, I believe that, for the human species to have survived as well as it has, our immune systems must be pretty tough. ESPECIALLY to make it through hundreds of thousands of years of dismal living conditions, and dismal medical treatments. Obviously our bodies can handle a sickness here or there.

I believe that breastfeeding and giving my child a natural antibodies to fight sickness is nature's intention. I believe that my child can be exposed to certain germs and her body will develop its own antibodies, and thus she will have a natural immunity rather than an artificial one.

(5) Vaccines don't necessarily protect your child from the intended illness. The whooping cough vaccine is notoriously known for being very ineffective. As a child, I was vaccinated for whooping cough and guess what - I still got it, in grade 3. I was MISERABLY sick for weeks, but with the proper treatment (humidifiers, puffers, etc), I was fine. And not just in the child's case, but ANY vaccine has the potential to be ineffective (ie: the flu vaccine "attempts" to predict which strain of flu could be the bad one for the year...most of the time, you inject yourself with the vaccine for the WRONG strain.) I would rather be sniffly and sneezy for 10 days than inject myself with such chemicals and nonsense.

In conclusion, there is NO way to know what the accumulation of all these vaccines will do to a person. 36 injections before the age of 3? Injecting things into your baby's body that were NEVER meant to be in a human's body is just a deplorable thought to me. I don't know how anyone could honestly justify vaccinating, especially after doing the research.

I find that many people shun those who choose not to vaccinate. But the difference, is that those of us who do not vaccinate have DONE OUR RESEARCH. We have not blindly accepted that "doctor knows best" when doctor is paid by pharmaceutical companies to sell, sell, sell. It is not about protecting health anymore, it is about making money. I find that, those who do vaccinate, have done so without an hour's worth of study. They do not investigate deeper, go around what one doctor suggests, and truly do the research and find out what these vaccines are doing to this world.

And when those parents who vaccinated because of fear DO do their research, they quickly become defensive about their decision to vaccinate because they feel cognitive dissonance between their decision and the evidence. That creates a hostile person, because they have done something that contradicts what the evidence truly says.

For all of these reasons, and then some, I choose not to vaccinate. I could never justify doing that to my child, especially after knowing what those vaccines contain, and the VERY high unlikelihood my child will contract anything in this day and age. And if she does catch something? No big deal. Maybe she'll be sick, but her body will fight it and she will be all the stronger for it.

Parents who do not vaccinate are often attacked by parents who do vaccinate. Why is it any of your concern? Why would you be worried? If your child is "VACCINATED" then you should have no problem with those who don't vaccinate. After all, your child won't 'get sick', right? So you are SO concerned for the health of my child? That you are willing to tell me I'm a bad parent for not vaccinating? I'm not sorry to say it, but I feel if you vaccinate without having done research, you fit the category of bad parent. In this day and age, it is essential to research. It is essential to go around the big pharmaceutical companies and the highly paid doctors and go behind the front lines, to discover for yourself what is going on. Watch documentaries, read the clinical experiments, open some books and do some research. This is your child's life, after all.

Thank you for this. I completely agree with you 100%. We are not intending to vaccinate.

My response is the following:

From the moment a baby is born the following is done: A synthetic Vitamin K injection is given to the child, and antibiotics are put in their eyes, all to 'protect the child'. Any pregnant woman who eats lots of greens throughout her pregnancy and doesn't have any STD's will be just fine without either of these, however these 'precautions' are 'recommended'. Why would my baby bleed to death?

I just gotta stop you and point you to this...
https://www.skepticalob.com/2013/01/baby-dies-because-mother-refused-newborn-vitamin-k-shot.html

Don't bother with the rest of the website... just scroll down to the link to the Coroner's Court.
Read the coroner's report and then please come back and tell me that the Vit K shot is unncessary.
It's a VITAMIN. Why on earth would anyone be against giving their baby a shot of a vitamin that will help prevent them from having blood clotting issues?

Not all vitamins are good, or beneficial, not to mention doses that are extreme. Taking the right amount of a vitamin can be beneficial, if it's a raw and a nonsynthetic vitamin, however taking a high dosage doesn't mean you'll just 'pee out the extra' as a lot of people think. It actually takes a huge toll on your body and can cause great disturbances. The digestion of a vitamin requires certain other vitamins and nutrients, thus the presence of that vitamin can deplete those other vitamins and nutrients, especially since the vitamin is synthetic. Synthetic vitamins do not include what is necessary for the absorption of those vitamins. High doses of Vitamin K put a lot of stress on the liver and kidney. Imagine what that does for a newborn without a functioning way to rid of excess vitamins and toxins that are included in that shot.

That Coroner's Report told me nothing aside from the fact that the baby had a clotting issue and bled to death. If we want to be technical, this situation means nothing as we don't know much context of the situation. I can find you 586 articles on anything you want to hear.

If you eat well, there should be no reason for your baby to need this large does of Vitamin K because 'extra' vitamins for the sake of safety are harmful, not beneficial. There IS such a thing as too much vitamins!! A lot of people don't know this. Realistically speaking, Hemorrhagic Disease of the Newborn is only 0.25 percent to 1.7 percent, however the effects of the overload of Vitamin K can ruing your baby's immune system and shut down their kidneys/liver, as well as possibly cause cancer, and jaundice. This shot started being administered as a precaution without much testing as to whether or not it was actually required. However as I've already stated, not all 'precautions' lead to positive results.

One thing to consider is that the shot initially causes psycho-emotional damage. Giving this shot to a baby overwhelms their sensory nervous system and gives your baby much unneeded distress. Many studies have already concluded that not only does a baby feel pain but they will store and remember it in a different way adults do, and this will affect them in the future. This is an unnecessary infliction of pain to your baby. As far as the actual dosing, the injection holds 20,000 times the needed dose of Vitamin K, and is based on normal adult values. Can you say 'overdoing it'?! This overwhelms the undeveloped immune system of your baby and put it at greater risk for infection. Vitamin K itself is not meant to be used as an injection, it's meant to be absorbed within the stomach and delivered to the rest of the body.

Eat a lot of greens and you should be fine. There are a thousand things that 'can' happen but that doesn't mean we have to inject babies with every sort of prevention technique. Colostrum itself is rich in Vitamin K (nature has a way of sorting itself out) and this should provide your baby with what it needs right from birth.

Hey, to each his own. I simply believe in knowing your stuff before accepting someone else's take on what's best for your baby. I'm sure we all have learned that not everything that comes out of someone else's mouth is fact or something we should abide by, and yes, the rule is golden for 'professionals' as well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,306
Messages
27,144,869
Members
255,758
Latest member
yednow
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->