He was a terrorist who supported some horrific practices.
He was member of Umkhonto we Sizwe, a terrorist organisation. So yes he was terrorist!
Call him what you want, a freedom fighter or whatever. He was committed to changing the way South Africa was run and he was prepared to do that using whatever means.
He was member of Umkhonto we Sizwe, a terrorist organisation. So yes he was terrorist!
Call him what you want, a freedom fighter or whatever. He was committed to changing the way South Africa was run and he was prepared to do that using whatever means.
Which is what I said...in fact he was a co-founder, not only a member. 'Terrorist' is somebody who uses scare tactics to reign control over a government, so the argument is there I suppose that he was once a terrorist. But can you really say that is his legacy? That he achieved his goals through terrorism?
I don't think it's fair to say 'whatever means' if he was not involved in the fatal bombings. By that logic, he would have conducted a very different movement once released from prison, rather than the message of peace and unity he pursued. He did not organise the death of anyone, yet is being continuously attached to MKs darkest acts today.
He was member of Umkhonto we Sizwe, a terrorist organisation. So yes he was terrorist!
Call him what you want, a freedom fighter or whatever. He was committed to changing the way South Africa was run and he was prepared to do that using whatever means.
Which is what I said...in fact he was a co-founder, not only a member. 'Terrorist' is somebody who uses scare tactics to reign control over a government, so the argument is there I suppose that he was once a terrorist. But can you really say that is his legacy? That he achieved his goals through terrorism?
I don't think it's fair to say 'whatever means' if he was not involved in the fatal bombings. By that logic, he would have conducted a very different movement once released from prison, rather than the message of peace and unity he pursued. He did not organise the death of anyone, yet is being continuously attached to MKs darkest acts today.
I can't say what his legacy is or will be. Of course the fact that apartheid has ended is brilliant but the media make out that it was all because of him. Little mention of De Klerk.
Mandela was also against IRA decommissioning and his ex-wife was involved in some serious inhuman stuff.
I suppose I just don't understand people who are suggesting that he was some sort of saint.