DottyLottie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2010
- Messages
- 789
- Reaction score
- 0
Oops
There are some people in developing countries that get zero.
There are some people in developing countries that get zero.
Of what relevance is this? We are not in developing countries, they have a whole set of problems we simply cannot relate to, including little or no healthcare.
It's like pointing out to someone who is going through a divorce, lost a baby or something that some people have no home, or some people have cancer, or some people are living in war zones, it is not consolation for anyones current plight. We all have our crosses to bare, I appreciate we should count our blessings, there is ALWAYS someone worse off, but what relevance does it really have in this discussion?
Well if you want to pay more taxes I guess that is upto you. I personally think the health care you get during pregnancy is FANTASTIC considering it is FREE.
Why scan everyone when they have a wonderful method that helps them find out who really needs more scans?
If you want more scans so desperately you can get private ones, and get your hands out of your own pockets, rather than everyone having to pay more taxes for something that isn't necessary.
Well if you want to pay more taxes I guess that is upto you. I personally think the health care you get during pregnancy is FANTASTIC considering it is FREE.
Why scan everyone when they have a wonderful method that helps them find out who really needs more scans?
If you want more scans so desperately you can get private ones, and get your hands out of your own pockets, rather than everyone having to pay more taxes for something that isn't necessary.
But it is not FREE, why do you think you pay your taxes?
Wow hunni glad things turn out ok. Like i said ive been very happy with my public healthcare in pregnancyin Aus. I dont think we in the western world can even fathom how lucky we arecompared to developing countries.I got 4 scans, but 2 extra had to be done. I'm grateful for what I got and if it wasn't for our system here in Australia and I had to pay for those two extra scans at the end, I might not have bothered as I would have thought all was well. My baby was footling breech and it was missed all through midwife appts and all so if I had gone into natural labor my LO might not be here now or I could have even bled to death trying to deliver him naturally. So I am extremely grateful for what I got for free as I don't have much money and paying for extra would have been a stretch I hate to think what could have happened if we didn't have the healthcare system we have now and I didn't get those last scans.
Post #158 (I can't quote such a long post on my phone):
"Constantly fails us" - are you serious?? Do you read The Daily Mail??
How many lives do you think the NHS saves every day? Your views have certainly been warped if this is really what you think of the NHS.
Like I said in my post that you have quoted, it's certainly not infallible but on a "what we get for what we pay" basis it's pretty bloody amazing!!! I couldn't cover the costs in THREE lifetimes for what it has done for my daughter!
Oh, I never said it was free either!!
Well if you want to pay more taxes I guess that is upto you. I personally think the health care you get during pregnancy is FANTASTIC considering it is FREE.
Why scan everyone when they have a wonderful method that helps them find out who really needs more scans?
If you want more scans so desperately you can get private ones, and get your hands out of your own pockets, rather than everyone having to pay more taxes for something that isn't necessary.
But it is not FREE, why do you think you pay your taxes?
The NHS should get their hand out their pockets ...
My point?
well in some countrys you get a scan every 4 weeks... here you get 2 or 3 max and thats your lot (unless they have concerns) instead what do they do here...use such a stupid inacurate device of measuring your fundal height and relying on that for babys growth... well im sorry but half the midwifes ive come across either measure diff/wrong to one another... or just did it briefly and ended up with a meh itl be reet attitude then the others turn around and go "ooooh we will keep an eye on that" majority of the time there is nothing wrong with babys size!!! how can they possibly rely on this!?!?!? if baby has his bum stuck up then obvs the fundal height is going to be higher!!! it just seems to me instead of been so cheap they should be offering a scan to check growth etc every 4 weeks!!! not just that but to make sure there is no further problems with placenta/cord or baby! and to check fluid!...
anyone else agree?
Sorry but no, I dont - you have ALL your healthcare needs taken care off for either free or a small deduction from your wages - how many "other countries" can say that?
Point us in the direction that says the fundal measrements / doppler tests / usual checks put babies at risk and I may be inclined to think again.
Ok, the NHS isnt infallible but I would take it over many, if not most other systems any day of the week and too many "Brits" arent thankful for what is available to us.
Why should we be "thankful" for a system that consistently fails us.