ladies. Sorry to go awol, it's been an intense few days.
Spoomie - Good Mantra, think I will adopt that one.
Miss C - I hope Jake is on the road to recovery.
PDMCD - I was gutted to hear your OH hadn't bothered with his SA and then delighted to read a few posts later that he has commenced and even more happy to hear your cyst has gone, that's a great relief.
Misty - I'm so sorry about the bad timing - I've been there myself and it truly sucks. You never know though, a last minute bd might just do it. Sometimes it's those cycles that you feel are just impossible that are the ones that catch!
Padbrat - 6 loses is such a lot to bear. I don't know what roads you've been down but have you investigated progesterone sups or baby asprin?
Pippi - thanks hun and yes you are correct with your timing
So apologies but this is a long post maybe get a cup of tea! We have now spent 2 intensive days with the Social Worker - I'm going to be very lazy and cut and past the details from my journal here, because it is such a lot to retype. So here's 2 days worth.
Thurs 10th May
Today was fine, horrible stuff to hear but SW basically told us the entire history of LG and her parents, the drugs, the drink and the violence, there were concerns from doctors and Social Welfare intervention from before she was born due to mother's heavy drinking whilst pg. The father has 112 offences and 43 convictions!!! He also has 7 children to 4 different women. the 2 youngest are LG and one other also 6 yrs - so 2 to 2 different women at the same time!!! Basically both parents have had several chances and been given 'help' but they are currently undergoing no professional help because they have disengaged themselves - they don't think they need help, they don't think there is anything wrong!!! All reports on them to date are negative including psychological and parental. The father knows about us because the SW is obligated to interview him for her report, he has said he doesn't want her coming to London, but he has given no reasons why just a 'No'. The mother is being seen by SW on Monday for the same reason. They are both being told that whatever happens they will not be getting their child back. The heartbreaking aspect is the LG loves her parents and last week when the mother posted on FB that her babe will be home in 7 weeks, LG thought her mum meant her and that she was going home. SW had to explain to her that her mum was talking about her dad. It's heartbreaking stuff.
We again underlined the fact we really want to adopt and will do the same again tomorrow - we want to be parents and we won't ever be able to do that with the birth parents lurking in the background. SW is going back to court next week to ask for more time. She is also going to see if there is another option outside of the Special Guardianship - I think she understands our point and partially agrees with us but she has to take LG's views into consideration. She says that this case is far from straight forward and is the most complexed she has ever worked on but it has been going on for to long. We have to consider what type of 'contact' with birth family we would be prepared to allow if we went for Special Guardianship. Which is hard, I mean what parent in their right mind would even consider sending their child off to visit a drug den inhabited by a man who's psychological report finds him to high risk violent? Anyone? no I thought not.
Tomorrow will be more in-depth about us.
Fri 11th May
Well SW has just left, we've been going strong since 1000 this morning and finally all the forms have been filled in and our thoughts on just about everything all written down, from our individual first 'steady relationships' to what sort of parents we would be. Exhausting. The only thing outstanding is our schooling and employment histories - which would be fine if we didn't have to include dates, God, this is so in-depth.
So we have maintained that we would prefer adoption and that will be noted in the report. However we have not pulled out of the Special Guardianship route as yet. In terms of what kind of contact we would be prepared to consider, we have told SW that we would not really be prepared to consider any contact with the father, subject to perhaps written correspondence and not via social networks, text or phone but proper bonefide letters. But we would consider 3 visits a year (suggested by the SW) with the mother - SW suggested these visits possibly take place in mother's home town at grandmothers house, and have other family members around too so they were quite informal 'family days' really. We could also be there if we wanted. We stipulated that should the mother turn up intoxicated in any way either drugs of alcohol we would not allow the contact to go ahead. We also added that we would have no problems in continuing contact with Grandparents, Aunts, Uncles and Cousins and that we would actively encourage these.
Interestingly SW did point out that in 99% of her cases where contact arrangements were put in place the birth parents did not keep to them and tended to just drift away almost as soon as the court made the order, but of course she couldn't guarantee this being the case here, but she did tell us without telling us iykwim that as the parental decision makers, we could decide to stop contact arrangements if we felt strongly that they were causing more distress than good for LG or LG didn't want to go to them anymore.
In her summing up SW told us that she has no doubts that we would make great parents and that the LG would have a fantastic life with us with many more opportunities than she would probably get anywhere else, the only thing she said that might have a negative impact on us was the 'contact arrangements', although she agreed with our views and totally understood them, she has to comply with the laws and as such has to take LG's views into consideration. Our next steps will be to meet LG, we don't know how far off this is yet and we will probably have to meet with the person appointed as LG's guardian too (this is an official person who ensures that the decisions reached by all concerned are in the best interests of the child and not the current carer).
What happens then is that SW, Guardian and Solicitors representing each of the birth parents all go to court and put their reports forward so the the judge can reach a decision, and set the order which takes immediate effect. This is approx 4 - 6 months away, depending on SW getting an extension to continue investigations. SW told us that at the last hearing both parents solicitors turned up and had nothing to say other than to tell the court they had had no correspondence from their clients!
So that's it for now! Have a great weekend everyone.