[What a silly comment!
I agree with aob. I wouldnt want to force River into anything. We put the food infront of her and she decides what she eats, i she doesnt touch the meat so be it same with the veg.
I think were designed to eat meat for a reason because we need it and although yes it is possible to have the nutrients now without it i think it would be a ongoing battle with a child.
What happens when your child is 5 and goes to a party and another child offers them a ham sandwhich?? surely a 5 year old wont know all this research about meat dairy. I think it can alienate them.
Its the same with sweets imo River wont be having sweets etc until she is 2 but if after that i said to her your not allowed sweets then she would want them all the more. Same with meat.
The OP has already said once her child is old enough to ask for it if they asked for meat or wanted to eat it she wouldn't refuse it.
The fact is, the majority of people in this country eat meat, so we see that as 'normal' and wean our children onto diets that include meat. They are not old enough to decide for themselves and as they have no choice, yes, we are 'forcing' it onto them, 'forcing' our beliefs (that we should eat meat) onto our children. So, if people are vegetarian or vegan it's pretty natural for them to offer their baby/child a vegetarian/vegan diet, just like we would offer our children a diet that included meat.
If a child is alientated because of it's diet, then the parents of the children doing the alientating need to look at how their children are behaving. Children have restricted diets for all sorts of reasons, not just parental choices. Children don't get alienated for allergies to food or not liking certain foods, so why should vegetarianism or veganism be any different? Unless, of course, we are a truly narrow minded society...