JASMAK
Mom of three
- Joined
- May 27, 2008
- Messages
- 14,703
- Reaction score
- 0
I think that it is probably good...I am not for shoving medicines down a child's throat though. I just think if a child needs support in school, they should be getting it, and if that means getting a diagnosis younger, in order to be elgible for that support, then I am for it. My brother wasn't diagnosed with ADHD until AFTER he quit school, left home, and got into the wrong crowd. He got no support from the school whatsoever, and was simply labelled a 'bad kid'. He is now a druggy and criminal. I would rather a child accidently mis-diagnosed and get extra support, than a child not diagnosed and slip through the cracks.
I can honestly say that we tortured ourselves over the decision to medicate Ollie, we argued over it for weeks until deciding to try him on the lowest dose possible. For us, our min concern was his school, he was falling behind in a big way because he just didn't have the concentration/attention. My worst fear was letting things continue how they were until things, like your brother, were too late by that stage.
School has noticed a big improvement from him this term and I believe its a combination of the extra support he is getting and the medication. Its by no means a miracle cure, he is still difficult and challenging, I wouldn't want him to be any other way really than a typical 7 year old boy, but it does seem to help with his symptoms.
As parents we just do what we feel is best for our child
And I would never judge anyone who did medicate their kids. What I meant was, and I should have been more clear, is that if the meds are necessary and make a marked POSTITIVE difference, then for sure. There might come a time when I will have to make that decision for my own daughter, with ASD, and the last thing I would ever need is someone judging me on that very hard decision, at the same time, I would never do it blindly without research and proper thought into it.