clio
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2011
- Messages
- 1,196
- Reaction score
- 0
Borboleta--that first time I did CIO it was nothing; he wanted to go to bed because it was the bedtime he had chosen. So he barely cried. But we were still awoken once a night for a bottle feed. Then teething started, and he would be up maybe two, then three times a night. Then it hit five times, and I said "No more. This stops now." He wasn't hungry, he wasn't in pain, he was just hoping to cause enough of a raucous to go downstairs and PAR-TAY. So, we tossed the monitor and ignored his now-typical 9:30 pm wake-up. After that one time, he knew we had his number and he's slept through ever since.
I know the whole argument about breaking their trust and so on, but I never believed in it. As Oma said, this boy knows to the core of his very being that we love him and will always be there for him. It was just time to stop night-time bottles and rushing in at the slightest sound (well, that was my husband...).
Then we tried CIO for naps, and it worked pretty well, but isn't as consistent, simply because he may not be tired enough. But we leave him for a good while up there until his babbling and "ooohing" just won't stop and we know he won't sleep. So now, when he is downstairs, we wait a while, and when he starts crying for absolutely no reason, we immediately put him to bed (but still with a bottle). And he will eventually fall asleep after a bit of crying.
But the key to all of this was not letting him fall asleep in our arms, like your doctor says. Otherwise, we do become a crutch.
CIO is the best thing we ever did. Not having to get up in the night is absolute bliss. And even if he wakes early, like 5:30 or 6 am, he goes down again around an hour and a half later again, so he sleeps even more.
Okay, got to go. J is crying and holding his ears, so I think I have to give him some Tylenol. Good luck.
ETA: I'd start with the night first--naps are hard because they are shorter. But that's just my personal feeling about that. I really don't know which are better.
I know the whole argument about breaking their trust and so on, but I never believed in it. As Oma said, this boy knows to the core of his very being that we love him and will always be there for him. It was just time to stop night-time bottles and rushing in at the slightest sound (well, that was my husband...).
Then we tried CIO for naps, and it worked pretty well, but isn't as consistent, simply because he may not be tired enough. But we leave him for a good while up there until his babbling and "ooohing" just won't stop and we know he won't sleep. So now, when he is downstairs, we wait a while, and when he starts crying for absolutely no reason, we immediately put him to bed (but still with a bottle). And he will eventually fall asleep after a bit of crying.
But the key to all of this was not letting him fall asleep in our arms, like your doctor says. Otherwise, we do become a crutch.
CIO is the best thing we ever did. Not having to get up in the night is absolute bliss. And even if he wakes early, like 5:30 or 6 am, he goes down again around an hour and a half later again, so he sleeps even more.
Okay, got to go. J is crying and holding his ears, so I think I have to give him some Tylenol. Good luck.
ETA: I'd start with the night first--naps are hard because they are shorter. But that's just my personal feeling about that. I really don't know which are better.