Day 1 on my official leave. I know I'm supposed to be resting, but I've done laundry and bathed the dogs today. lol and then decided to play video games the rest of the day.
It's been nice. DH is telling me I should be resting instead of cleaning house or washing the dogs but I know baby is coming soon and I wanted to make sure these little things were done first.
Star - That's great that the scan went well! and CONGRATS on being Team Blue!
drjo - The week early won't affect my maternity leave. My leave dates are already set with FMLA, so those dates are solid. Being out a week early won't affect me since I'll use sick leave to compensate for that week. It does mean I won't have as much sick leave to use to help pay for my insurance premiums for the months I'm on leave (leave is not paid) or for after I return if baby or I get sick. But we'll figure that out, and hope we don't get sick.
I am hoping she doesn't come late because I did set up my leave to start January 9th (technically the 7th, but weekends don't count) and so I'm already worried that if she comes late then I'm losing some of my valuable time with her.
Good luck with the ovulation!
Kat - I didn't think it was possible either, but the woman who ran our birthing class is also a labor support / doula and does lactation help (plus went through the same thing with her own 5 kids as a working mom who breastfed) so she seems to know what she was talking about. From what I understand from her (and from my friends who work and pumped) you produce milk as a "supply and demand" kind of thing. The more demand, the more you produce (assuming everything is working as it should), and that your body learns to produce more milk during the times that baby is usually feeding. So if baby feeds every 2-3 hours, you are producing milk to feed at that rate, etc. If you are adding pumping to that, your body just thinks you are feeding baby more often so after a day or two it would adjust to produce more milk to take care of that. It makes sense, especially since women years ago (think 1800s and earlier) hired wet nurses to breast feed their babies because "classy women" didn't BF. But many of those wet nurses were feeding their own child plus other people's and they produced enough milk to do it. And women who have twins can easily produce enough milk to feed them. It helps that I have a friend whose mom is a Lactation nurse and she's got tons of tricks and ideas for getting your body to produce more if it's not producing enough, and how to pump and BF and storage etc.
A couple of my friends had said that their babies would eat every 2-3 hours during the day but started sleeping through the night fairly quickly and they found that their body just adjusted and produced more milk during the day and less at night to meet baby schedule.
I will need to pump to have milk for baby while I'm at work. I'm looking into how I can start pumping earlier (during mat leave) and storing it. Breast milk can be frozen for up to several months (I've heard anywhere from 5-12 depending on the freezer temp) so I'm going to look into starting to pump early on and store milk up in advance. Then I don't have to worry as much when I go back to work about having to keep up a little storage supply.
JoJazie - I can get comfortable most of the time. Now that baby has dropped it's a lot easier to get comfortable with breathing at least. Before it could be really hard to breathe. Laying down is okay as long as I have pillows for support, the hardest part is my hips/pelvis have a lot of pain and so laying down in certain positions for very long can be painful. The needing to go to the bathroom a lot at night from hormones happens mostly in 1st Tri. In 2nd tri and early 3rd tri I almost never needed to get up, or only once. Now though, because she's dropped, she's putting a lot of pressure on my bladder so I get up at least twice at night, sometimes 3-4 times if I drink a lot in the evening (and I tend to drink a ton of water all the time so it's common to get up 2-3 times a night now). When I was working it was a lot harder, I was coping okay but the hardest part was the random insomnia. I'd fall asleep quickly around 9pm, wake up around 11pm to go to the bathroom and and wake up 1-2am and wouldn't be able to go back to sleep at all. I'd be wide awake staring at the ceiling until 4-5am. My alarm goes off at 5 for work so I was getting 4 hours of sleep max. It was really hard. Doctor actually suggested I take tylonel pm or benedryl before bed for a couple weeks because I wasn't sleeping. It saved my life. Since i've been on break I haven't been taking anything because if I have insomnia now I know I can fall back asleep eventually and just sleep during the day.
As for the GBS - like drjo said, the risk is actually pretty small (1-2% my doctor said) that the baby would catch GBS if you choose not to treat with antiobiotics. The problem is that the effects are so horrible and death a very real possibility if they do catch it, that protocol is to automatically test and treat women who have it. I honestly don't know if those who do home births get the antibiotics because it's done through IV. I assume they don't get it. And of course they wouldn't use any antibiotics that could cause any harm to the baby. I know at least one or two people in one of my due date groups that said they were GBS positive in several of their pregnancies and did home births and refused antibiotics and their babies were fine. And that's completely their choice. I, on the other hand, have waited and tries for years for this baby and am not willing to risk her life with even a 1-2% chance she could catch a deadly disease when it is 100% preventable with no risk to her. But, that's also my personal opinion. I've had 2 losses already. I just can't imagine the possibility that I could lose her when I've made it this far already.
You are right in that we've been giving birth for hundreds or thousands of years. BUT the survival rate of both mothers and babies has also significantly increased over time due to medical interventions such as these. Theoretically you could argue we shouldn't need the interventions because we didn't have them before, but death during child birth was a real danger. Even in the early 1900s (like the 1920s-40s), about 8% of women died in child birth. That doesn't even cover the babies who died.