I feel like it is more kind to women to be honest about it and still be sympathetic and understanding than to give them false hope and let them crash harder in the end. She was confused by what was going on and there was simply a suggestion as to what it could be. Nobody wants to have bad news, and nobody wants anything but the best for Beth, but because they care maybe they felt like the kinder thing to do would be to give a possible explanation so that if it turned out to be the case (God forbid) it wouldn't come as such a shock. It can just be very upsetting to see woman after woman encourage someone that everything is perfect, or they have a for sure positive test, and they get their hopes up becuase everyone seems to share the same positive opinion. Then if bad news comes later, they are more heartbroken because everyone had them convinced there was nothing wrong. Again, I'm not saying that there is something wrong for Beth, it could go the completely oppostie direction and I hope it does. It's just always better to be honest
I dont think there is a woman on here who enjoys or believes in FALSE hope, but to give a medical opinion as a lay person isn't fair.. speculating on lines or no lines, or pink or grey, those are subjective things that an arm chair expert can debate about.. Honesty is great, I agree, brutal honesty, while it is honest there is a thing called tact as well.. When someone is going through so much, they are already being devils advocate, the negative person.. Look Beth even said she thought she was being punished.. SO AT THAT TIME its best to be honest/negative/realistic? Or is it better to offer words of encouragements, maybe even revisit the what-if's.. we all do it, and most of us do the negative what-ifs, not the positive ones..
Human beings in general tend to be rather pessimistic in nature, and dont think positively.. I am all for a more positive approach.. Besides she already has the medical community giving her the doom and gloom report.. I don't feel the need to add to that!