What so you think of how the author portrayed women?
~ Pretty unrealistically, in my opinion. They were all pretty. Different types of pretty, but pretty. Seriously? There weren't any better adjectives to describe how a woman looks? They were all portrayed as "strong" women who just kind of failed to manage their own lives. They were all happier with men in their lives than they were on their own, even when they were treated like dirt by those men. All except Cissy. She was my favorite character. But she still annoyed me in the way she just let things happen to her more often than not, rather than take charge of decisions for her own life. She was very good at taking care of other people, though.
What do you think of how the characters dealt with loss? Was it realistic?
~ I don't know? I personally haven't experienced the types of losses these women dealt with. I haven't been divorced or widowed, I haven't lost a child, I haven't lost a home or a family or a job. I'm not sure whether it's realistic for everyone to just wander through life a bit aimlessly for so long like they all seemed to, though.
What do you think of June "protecting" Lolly by not telling her about her father. And what do you think about her leaving her daughter to live with her husband when her husband was known to like underage (young) girls?
~Personally, I don't call it "protecting" to leave a young girl with a man who routinely beds much younger women without telling her about that side of him. I call that irresponsible. True, the cradle-robbing doesn't necessarily translate to child sexual abuse, but all the same, I can't agree with June's decision here. Lolly was being exposed to sneaky behavior and unhealthy grooming mannerisms whether she realized it or not. I can understand June not wanting to upset Lolly's views of her father, but leaving a young and impressionable girl in that environment was just flat out irresponsible and selfish.
And how did Luke get back in the house without seeing June in the lawn chairs? (because that seriously bugged the crap out of me)
~Good. Frikken. Question. My only guess is that he purposely ignored her because he was still being pissy but wanted to go to bed.
I think starting the book from the POV of Silas, then just not mentioning him again until he started getting all creepy with his stalking of Lydia was kind of a give-away for his involvement in the accident. Not so much the sneaking-in-and-messing-with-the-burners aspect, but the he-knows-more-than-he's-saying-and-people-died-because-he-didn't-act-responsibly kind of way. For me, that was the heart of this book. It was about grieving and isolation, yes, but I saw more common threads of people failing to act responsibly through their lives. Extra-marital affairs, not admitting mistakes soon enough, running away, emotionally abandoning children, it was just everywhere.
Also, finding out Luke was the product of a one-night-stand was a real punch in the gut.