silverbell
Adopted Little Pink :)
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2010
- Messages
- 8,474
- Reaction score
- 4
It is SO unpleasant that the first thing they suggest is Donor or Adoption. Nothing wrong with either but why make people believe there are no alternatives when there are SO many Azospermia babies out there?
If you want a bit of hope tigerlilly1975, a few years ago we were right where you are today, an urologist shook his head and said "well you won't have your own children but donor is always a possibility" and today we spent the day worrying about the impossible-child's chicken pox and researching which IVF clinic we'll make her a brother at!
What an inspiring and wonderful post.
Our GP didn't even realise that a biopsy to the testicles existed, let alone that those with azoospermia could father children with sperm retrieved. You should have seen his face when he found out. I felt it was my place to educate him at our last visit
Our doc wrote to the Urologist that he doubted my DH would ever father his own children and the Urologist didn't exactly dismiss it. It makes me mad and just glad we're seeing a real specialist in a couple of days, as at least we'll know 100% that there's no chance or some chance instead of professionals who aren't actually clued up at all on this subject making flippant and unsubstantiated comments.
Thanks for your positive post and for reminding those of us who haven't been through an SSR/TESE that there is still a bit of hope out there, despite what so many in the medical profession seem to suggest.