TigerLady
CaveTiger Clan Mama
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2008
- Messages
- 23,148
- Reaction score
- 0
Please let me preface this by saying I imagine this might be a sensitive topic. I absolutely do NOT want any offensive remarks or bickering over it. I simply am curious about what others think and welcome EVERYone's beliefs, no matter what they are. So, let's have a civil thread about this, please and thank you.
I heard a radio show today about the "Ethics" of limiting the number of children people have. I know all about gender selection abortions and other highly questionable practices which result from making this a legal obligation. I do not wish to debate the pros or cons of making legislation about this. However, I am curious if anyone has made the PERSONAL decision to limit the number of children they have and why?
I ask because I, personally, am considering it. I know I absolutely do not want more than 2. And I would want less than that if my OH already had a kid(s). I figure 2 is replacement for us. However, we are discussing the possibilty of just one.
There is such a thing as carrying capacity -- and it is a absolutely defensible argument that humans have reached ours (or even exceeded it). Technology is the only thing that has, thus far, prevented us from collasping as a popluation. When these collapses happen to other species they are often brutal -- starvation and disease is rampant.
So, is it fair to our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren to continue to bank on technology to keep us going? Is it fair to risk putting a future generation (of our own children) in danger of such a collapse?
On the other hand, is it fair to expect parents, especially good ones, to make the personal choice to limit the number of children they have and nuture? I know many people find big families very rewarding. I am a firm believer in freedom of choice and the size of the family you have is a choice.
So, what have you chosen? A big family or small? And why?
My OH is talking about getting snipped right after this baby is born and I am not sure I am ready for that step. So, thank you for your input!!
I heard a radio show today about the "Ethics" of limiting the number of children people have. I know all about gender selection abortions and other highly questionable practices which result from making this a legal obligation. I do not wish to debate the pros or cons of making legislation about this. However, I am curious if anyone has made the PERSONAL decision to limit the number of children they have and why?
I ask because I, personally, am considering it. I know I absolutely do not want more than 2. And I would want less than that if my OH already had a kid(s). I figure 2 is replacement for us. However, we are discussing the possibilty of just one.
There is such a thing as carrying capacity -- and it is a absolutely defensible argument that humans have reached ours (or even exceeded it). Technology is the only thing that has, thus far, prevented us from collasping as a popluation. When these collapses happen to other species they are often brutal -- starvation and disease is rampant.
So, is it fair to our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren to continue to bank on technology to keep us going? Is it fair to risk putting a future generation (of our own children) in danger of such a collapse?
On the other hand, is it fair to expect parents, especially good ones, to make the personal choice to limit the number of children they have and nuture? I know many people find big families very rewarding. I am a firm believer in freedom of choice and the size of the family you have is a choice.
So, what have you chosen? A big family or small? And why?
My OH is talking about getting snipped right after this baby is born and I am not sure I am ready for that step. So, thank you for your input!!