- Joined
- Aug 16, 2010
- Messages
- 12,899
- Reaction score
- 858
Ok, so, definitely not pregnant. Did the last test for this cycle, but I used on of the FRER dip sticks that came in that multi-pack, and WOW they're awful!! Just about as good as an internet cheapie. I feel ripped off honestly. First off, they're thin just like an ic. I dipped it and it took several minutes for the test line to even appear, and then several more for it to get dark, which it never really got all that dark. NOTHING compared to the actual FRER tests. I'd hate to try and spot a line on that thing if I ever had too. They might be good for repeat testing after you get a positive but I don't even know about that....so my vote is just spend a few more bucks and get 5 FRER's if you must, not that box. Or better yet get your 2 pack of FRER and wally cheapies. They have been good to me, I think I may just get those going forward if they're available (they sell out a lot at my store).
Anyway I also read a very interesting article/study last night. It was concerning implantation date vs. pregnancy success. With a sampling of about 189 pregnancies, this study showed that successful pregnancies were most likely at 8 and 9 dpo (measured by picking up hcg in the urine), with, like, a 12% early loss. 10dpo went up to 25% early loss, then about 50% at 11dpo and it just went up from there. This was interesting to me because when I was looking at tests on CTP for late implanters (because I'm obsessive), I definitely noticed women who had their first tests at 11dpo+ seemed to have a lot of chemicals (not always but often). Anyway it was compelling so I thought I'd share. Also I read the actual case study, not a regurgitation of it.
Winter TBH about speech it *may* have been helpful in the start but I don't really think it was as time went on. I think it was really just a matter of him aging and figuring it out. We only had once a week 45 minute sessions, and then nothing over the summers. Have you made any decision about the OB?
Dobs, what is Archive 81 and what are you watching it on? hmm day 25 looks almost positive to me, so maybe that was when you ov'ed? That seems like a reasonable lp doesn't it? Maybe a little on the short side....hmm hope you're skin issues subside before Sunday! Hormonal related, i assume...?
Anyway I also read a very interesting article/study last night. It was concerning implantation date vs. pregnancy success. With a sampling of about 189 pregnancies, this study showed that successful pregnancies were most likely at 8 and 9 dpo (measured by picking up hcg in the urine), with, like, a 12% early loss. 10dpo went up to 25% early loss, then about 50% at 11dpo and it just went up from there. This was interesting to me because when I was looking at tests on CTP for late implanters (because I'm obsessive), I definitely noticed women who had their first tests at 11dpo+ seemed to have a lot of chemicals (not always but often). Anyway it was compelling so I thought I'd share. Also I read the actual case study, not a regurgitation of it.
Winter TBH about speech it *may* have been helpful in the start but I don't really think it was as time went on. I think it was really just a matter of him aging and figuring it out. We only had once a week 45 minute sessions, and then nothing over the summers. Have you made any decision about the OB?
Dobs, what is Archive 81 and what are you watching it on? hmm day 25 looks almost positive to me, so maybe that was when you ov'ed? That seems like a reasonable lp doesn't it? Maybe a little on the short side....hmm hope you're skin issues subside before Sunday! Hormonal related, i assume...?