3011busyyear
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2010
- Messages
- 2,303
- Reaction score
- 0
I'd asked to do full time but two days from home on the basis that I can do my whole job from home, can check emails, transfer my phone, access all dept files from home etc.
My reason was that due to hubby's job changes he will be away a lot so can't drop off and pick up LO from nursery earlier/later than I can get to and from work. So LO will have to be in nursery from 7.30am until they close at 6pm. If I worked at home it would save the two hour travel time each way so she'd do two hours less a day in nursery.
After waiting for 3weeks he said:
I have taken some advice on your proposal regarding working from home and would not be able to support two days per week as this would fundamentally change the nature of your role and would set a precedent.* As you know I want to be as flexible as possible to meet your new situation and would be able to support part-time working as a compromise.
I will contact you next week once I have discussed your request in full with HR.
Part time wouldn't really be that beneficial financially and tbh he made out the role was full time, so basically I would end up doing full time workload in 3days. I didn't even mention doing part time to him. I just don't want to go back at all now. And so what if it sets a precedent...someone has to that's the point of setting a precedent, is he waiting for someone more important than me to set it first
My reason was that due to hubby's job changes he will be away a lot so can't drop off and pick up LO from nursery earlier/later than I can get to and from work. So LO will have to be in nursery from 7.30am until they close at 6pm. If I worked at home it would save the two hour travel time each way so she'd do two hours less a day in nursery.
After waiting for 3weeks he said:
I have taken some advice on your proposal regarding working from home and would not be able to support two days per week as this would fundamentally change the nature of your role and would set a precedent.* As you know I want to be as flexible as possible to meet your new situation and would be able to support part-time working as a compromise.
I will contact you next week once I have discussed your request in full with HR.
Part time wouldn't really be that beneficial financially and tbh he made out the role was full time, so basically I would end up doing full time workload in 3days. I didn't even mention doing part time to him. I just don't want to go back at all now. And so what if it sets a precedent...someone has to that's the point of setting a precedent, is he waiting for someone more important than me to set it first