P
purple_socks
Guest
well maybe you read that differently to me - I read that as meaning what it says ''As they eat more solids, your baby will want less milk'' there fore the baby will want less milk, as they are eating more food (not drop a bottle so that it has to eat more food).
This is no different from BLW - if a BLW were eating plenty it would naturally drink less milk, it just happens that BLW babies often are not eating as much for a few months so have more milk for longer, but once they are eating more they too will drop milk amounts.
I think the reason you are going away is that you have said some silly comments about how things used to be, and bundled them up with what people do these days, but you have no actual facts or way to say that's the way its suggested these days - because it doesnt exist.
prehaps this will clear things up 4 u...i wasn't the one that originally said these 'silly comments' that started u off...i purely butted in (kinda wish i hadn't now) in an attempt to explain something for u, as u were getting quite het up abt peoples reasons 4 BLW being based on methods that r not the 'correct' TW methods..
as i have said b4 (many many times now ) everyone has their own adapted versions of TW...BUT i was pointing out to u that the 'proper' original version of TW (devised back in WW2) has certain methods and 'rules' to it which some of us didn't like. no1 is saying everyone does it 'by the book' these days but if u keep banding abt words like 'correct' and 'proper' TW then u really r talking abt something completely differently to what u actually do....proper TW follows a schedual, u start at a certain point (usually a little bit of baby rice once a day) and there is a controlled build up to the final stage. bottles should b dropped-preferable naturally but if that doesn't seem to happen then 'proper' TW advises that u initiate that (check further into government guidelines and recommendations before u argue...there r guidelines on the amount of food/milk LO r 'meant' to have and these r still based on those ww2 'rules')
the NHS's advice is still based on that original plan from all those many years ago with some slight 'lightening' on strickness...BUT ESSENTIALLY IT IS THE SAME METHOD. i'm not slagging it off, i've never slagged it off...i never said 'silly things' abt it. i was just pointing it out there there r fundermental differences between 'proper' BLW and 'proper' TW
i think if anyone is poorly informed it is u.
as i have also said many many times now...not alot of people follow these old fashioned methods (incl HV)...i am aware that pretty much everyone uses that original plan as a basis to create a more flexible method.
This all started because someone was talking abt not like the BASIS of TW...not like that there r certain mental attitudes remaining from that old fashioned way.
I'm not really sure y u keep taking things that people have said and nit picking at them?
Also i think the last part of ur statement is quite rude...i was blush: altho clearly not lol) going away from this thread because i didn't want it going round in circles...i didn't like the 'fightiness' of ur replies to anyone posting abt BLW and it was making me sad to keep seeing how this thread had turned...u seemed to b taking other peoples reasons for being pro BWL as some sort of insult on TW...and for some reason u seem to b getting really offended and het up abt discussions on where TW was derived from?
Anywho hopefully u know see where ur misunderstanding stemded from and things can get back to being a more chilled (and interesting) discussion on peoples weaning methods/feelings on these methods