Well, I think we've decided against a vbac. I just saw my OB today for the first time and well, I know he wasn't trying to, but he freaked me right out!
I always knew there was a risk to myself with a vbac, I wasn't aware that there was such a risk for baby with one. At least there is here in my town. It's mostly due to how the hospital is set up. I don't live in a major city, and yes we have a good sized hospital, but it's still small compared to some.
Anyways, basically the chances of a uterine rupture here is 1in100 to 1in200. And if it ruptured, baby's oxygen would be in jeopardy and he could die or have some development issues after due to lack of oxygen. And I just don't think that's a risk we're willing to take. I could also loose my uterus if the damage was bad enough.
He was also flat out and said based on my DD's birth, he did not think I would have a successful vbac. (he was my OB then too) I had 6 vaginal inductions, oxytocin drip and they broke my waters. I still only dilated 1cm, maybe 1 1/2cms. Also, inductions can increase the risk of uterine rupture. So that's something to think about too.
DH doesn't want the unnecessary risk or stress of the vbac now. So I think it will be a repeat c-section. Of course, I'm not totally made up about it yet. I have my growth scan tomorrow morning. So we will see how big the little guy is.
I've kept most of DD's stuff. Well, in all honesty I'm only really holding on to the clothes from the first year. Otherwise I want to get rid of it all. Too much stuff and the older she got, the more worn out she'd have her clothes by the time they didn't fit anymore, lol
I have a lot of gender nuetral stuff from the first 6 months, and even some 12 month sleeps. So definitely will be using those. Already have them out.
I went to the store the other day to get get some laundry detergent and noticed they don't sell the same Ivory snow detergent I used with my DD. They really only had one kind you bought then and I don't see it. So now I don't know what to use! There's another kind, but I'm not 100% sure if that's what replaced it or not.