silverlizard
2 mcs, trying again
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 386
- Reaction score
- 0
No offence taken. I thought chemical was before a heartbeat would start? So anything before say 8 weeks is a chemical? But I could be, and usually am completely wrong!
I'm pretty sure that is referred to as an "early miscarriage" and not a chemical, usually? Or that's been my experience anyway.
But regardless of terminology... what I meant to say is that I think a short luteal phase is more likely to result in an egg that never implants at all (so you would never even get a BFP), or otherwise a VERY early loss, like at or before 4 weeks. So maybe it's a good sign that you did get to five weeks? (And sorry too if that's really tactless. I sort of hate people telling me things about my loss are a 'good sign', but at the same time I did find it comforting to know that at least me and my partner can conceive.)